<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TiddlyWiki &#8211; The Future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.vinuth.com/la-gubya/2006/02/25/tiddlywiki-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.vinuth.com/la-gubya/2006/02/25/tiddlywiki-the-future/</link>
	<description>There&#039;s always a way out.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gubbi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.vinuth.com/la-gubya/2006/02/25/tiddlywiki-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Gubbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.vinuth.com/the-holy-trail/?p=5#comment-68</guid>
		<description>For now Creative Commons seems to be the better option. Also looking at the path open source has taken, people will be forced to relax copyrights in _content_ industry also. At present it&#039;s more of an ethical issue to the publishers as to which license they&#039;ll go for. But going forward they&#039;ll find relaxing copyrights will pull in more money and many others will just join the tide.

And as u have said, copyrights are used in funny ways sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now Creative Commons seems to be the better option. Also looking at the path open source has taken, people will be forced to relax copyrights in _content_ industry also. At present it&#8217;s more of an ethical issue to the publishers as to which license they&#8217;ll go for. But going forward they&#8217;ll find relaxing copyrights will pull in more money and many others will just join the tide.</p>
<p>And as u have said, copyrights are used in funny ways sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.vinuth.com/la-gubya/2006/02/25/tiddlywiki-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.vinuth.com/the-holy-trail/?p=5#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I would be happy to see copyrights relaxed.  I just got accused of plagerism on a grad paper when I &quot;copied&quot; a sentence concerning the translation of a certain Swedish prounoun.  Though I cited the book source the prof is an old stickler and said I should have reworded the sentence from &quot;can be translated as&quot; to something else like &quot;could be translated as&quot;.  The plagerism thing was all he had to say about the paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be happy to see copyrights relaxed.  I just got accused of plagerism on a grad paper when I &#8220;copied&#8221; a sentence concerning the translation of a certain Swedish prounoun.  Though I cited the book source the prof is an old stickler and said I should have reworded the sentence from &#8220;can be translated as&#8221; to something else like &#8220;could be translated as&#8221;.  The plagerism thing was all he had to say about the paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
